lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc60c33e-c268-4e7e-94f9-e573545ffe98@web.de>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 19:29:28 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
 Matthew Sakai <msakai@...hat.com>, "J. corwin Coburn"
 <corwin@...lbutnet.net>, Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@...miny.me>,
 Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
 kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dm vdo slab-depot: delete unnecessary check

> This is a duplicate check

Was this implementation detail detected with any known source code analysis tool?


> so it can't be true. …

I suggest to reconsider this information a bit more.
Would you usually expect the outcome “result == VDO_SUCCESS” from a call
of the function “uds_allocate”?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ