linux-kernel - Re: Problems with csum_partial with misaligned buffers on sh4 platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 10:53:39 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>, 
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problems with csum_partial with misaligned buffers on sh4 platform

Hi Günter,

On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 10:59 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> On 2/10/24 12:12, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > I have not run these tests before. Can you tell me how these are run,
> > so I can verify these reproduce on real hardware?
>
> Enabling CONFIG_KUNIT and CONFIG_CHECKSUM_KUNIT on top of a working
> configuration should do the trick. Both can be built as module,
> so presumably one can build and load them separately. I have not tried
> that, though - I always build them into the kernel and boot the resulting
> image.

Yes, you can build and load them as modules separately; that's what
I do on m68k (and yes, the checksum test fails on m68k, as it is
big endian).

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68korg

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds