[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240211111436.GD19364@1wt.eu>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 12:14:36 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...g.com.ar>
Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] tools/nolibc: Fix strlcpy() return code and size
usage
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 12:08:14PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> And I think we should explicitly mark
> strlen() and the few other ones we're marking weak as noinline so that
> the compiler perfers a call there to inlining.
So actually the weak argument always prevents inlining from happening
so this is not needed (I didn't have it in my previous test).
Willy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists