[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d10e7d8-9d3e-43f9-95d8-67247ffa091c@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 13:26:09 -0500
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
brauner@...nel.org, chuck.lever@...cle.com, jlayton@...nel.org,
neilb@...e.de, kolga@...app.com, Dai.Ngo@...cle.com, tom@...pey.com,
paul@...l-moore.com, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
zohar@...ux.ibm.com, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com,
eric.snowberg@...cle.com, dhowells@...hat.com, jarkko@...nel.org,
stephen.smalley.work@...il.com, eparis@...isplace.org,
casey@...aufler-ca.com, shuah@...nel.org, mic@...ikod.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 22/25] evm: Move to LSM infrastructure
On 1/15/24 13:18, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
>
> As for IMA, move hardcoded EVM function calls from various places in the
> kernel to the LSM infrastructure, by introducing a new LSM named 'evm'
> (last and always enabled like 'ima'). The order in the Makefile ensures
> that 'evm' hooks are executed after 'ima' ones.
>
> Make EVM functions as static (except for evm_inode_init_security(), which
> is exported), and register them as hook implementations in init_evm_lsm().
> Also move the inline functions evm_inode_remove_acl(),
> evm_inode_post_remove_acl(), and evm_inode_post_set_acl() from the public
> evm.h header to evm_main.c.
>
> Unlike before (see commit to move IMA to the LSM infrastructure),
> evm_inode_post_setattr(), evm_inode_post_set_acl(),
> evm_inode_post_remove_acl(), and evm_inode_post_removexattr() are not
> executed for private inodes.
>
> Finally, add the LSM_ID_EVM case in lsm_list_modules_test.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
> }
>
> +static struct security_hook_list evm_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> + LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_setattr, evm_inode_setattr),
> + LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_post_setattr, evm_inode_post_setattr),
> + LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_copy_up_xattr, evm_inode_copy_up_xattr),
> + LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_setxattr, evm_inode_setxattr),
> + LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_set_acl, evm_inode_set_acl),
> + LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_post_set_acl, evm_inode_post_set_acl),
> + LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_remove_acl, evm_inode_remove_acl),
> + LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_post_remove_acl, evm_inode_post_remove_acl),
> + LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_post_setxattr, evm_inode_post_setxattr),
nit: move this one up after inode_setxattr.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists