linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] configs/debug: add NET debug config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 10:39:55 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@...cinc.com>, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] configs/debug: add NET debug config

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:47:14AM +0100, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
> The debug.config file is really great to easily enable a bunch of
> general debugging features on a CI-like setup. But it would be great to
> also include core networking debugging config.
> 
> A few CI's validating features from the Net tree also enable a few other
> debugging options on top of debug.config. A small selection is quite
> generic for the whole net tree. They validate some assumptions in
> different parts of the core net tree. As suggested by Jakub Kicinski in
> [1], having them added to this debug.config file would help other CIs
> using network features to find bugs in this area.
> 
> Note that the two REFCNT configs also select REF_TRACKER, which doesn't
> seem to be an issue.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240202093148.33bd2b14@kernel.org/T/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@...nel.org>
> ---
> Notes:
>   - It looks like this debug.config doesn't have a specific maintainer.
>     If this patch is not rejected, I don't know if this modification can
>     go through the net tree, or if it should be handled by Andrew.
>     Probably the latter? I didn't add [net-next] in the subject for this
>     reason.

Adding these seem reasonable. I touched debug.config last, so I can take
it via the kernel hardening tree if netdev doesn't want to take it.

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

-Kees

> ---
>  kernel/configs/debug.config | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/configs/debug.config b/kernel/configs/debug.config
> index 4722b998a324..509ee703de15 100644
> --- a/kernel/configs/debug.config
> +++ b/kernel/configs/debug.config
> @@ -40,6 +40,12 @@ CONFIG_UBSAN_ENUM=y
>  CONFIG_UBSAN_SHIFT=y
>  CONFIG_UBSAN_UNREACHABLE=y
>  #
> +# Networking Debugging
> +#
> +CONFIG_NET_DEV_REFCNT_TRACKER=y
> +CONFIG_NET_NS_REFCNT_TRACKER=y
> +CONFIG_DEBUG_NET=y
> +#
>  # Memory Debugging
>  #
>  # CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is not set
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 841c35169323cd833294798e58b9bf63fa4fa1de
> change-id: 20240212-kconfig-debug-enable-net-c2dc61002252
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@...nel.org>
> 

-- 
Kees Cook