[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34b19db5-bd72-457c-9b6a-c2089f6be83c@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 14:43:28 -0500
From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Naik, Avadhut" <avadnaik@....com>
Cc: yazen.ghannam@....com, "Mehta, Sohil" <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/MCE: Add command line option to extend MCE
Records pool
On 2/12/2024 1:58 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> I need to look more at the genpool code, but I thought I'd ask too.
>
> Yazen,
>
> gen_pool_add_owner() is the code that adds an extra chunk to an existing genpool.
>
> This bit doesn't look obviously safe against a #MC at the wrong moment in the middle of
> the list_add_rcu()
>
> spin_lock(&pool->lock);
> list_add_rcu(&chunk->next_chunk, &pool->chunks);
> spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>
Thanks Tony.
So the concern is not about traversal, but rather that the #MC can break the
list_add_rcu(). Is this correct?
Thanks,
Yazen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists