[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d86d658e-7025-491c-b0b7-6fb4d7247ea6@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 14:50:22 -0500
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
brauner@...nel.org, chuck.lever@...cle.com, jlayton@...nel.org,
neilb@...e.de, kolga@...app.com, Dai.Ngo@...cle.com, tom@...pey.com,
paul@...l-moore.com, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
zohar@...ux.ibm.com, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com,
eric.snowberg@...cle.com, dhowells@...hat.com, jarkko@...nel.org,
stephen.smalley.work@...il.com, eparis@...isplace.org,
casey@...aufler-ca.com, shuah@...nel.org, mic@...ikod.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 25/25] integrity: Remove LSM
On 1/15/24 13:18, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
>
> Since now IMA and EVM use their own integrity metadata, it is safe to
> remove the 'integrity' LSM, with its management of integrity metadata.
>
> Keep the iint.c file only for loading IMA and EVM keys at boot, and for
> creating the integrity directory in securityfs (we need to keep it for
> retrocompatibility reasons).
>
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists