linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: damon: add access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240212202356.73461-1-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 12:23:56 -0800
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	damon@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: damon: add access_memory to .gitignore

On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 21:07:34 +0100 Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 12.02.24 20:53, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 20:43:39 +0100 Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> This binary is missing in the .gitignore and stays as an untracked file.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>
> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
> > 
> > 'checkpatch.pl' complains as below:
> > 
> >     WARNING: Reported-by: should be immediately followed by Closes: with a URL to the report
> >     #11:
> >     Reported-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>
> >     Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
> > 
> > I guess the 'Closes:' could this link?
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/AS8P193MB1285C963658008F1B2702AF7E4792@AS8P193MB1285.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
> >
> 
> I will add the Closes tag with the right link, thank you.

Thank you :)

> 
> > Also, note that this conflicts on mm-unstable.
> 
> Should I use mm-unstable as basis to make sure no conflicts are introduced?

DAMON selftest patches could be merged in mm-unstable or linux-kselftest
depending on cases.

If you rebase this on mm-unstable, it might conflict on linux-kselftest.
Letting Shuah merge this on linux-kselftest and asking Linus Torvalds to fix
the conflict in next merge window could be one possible option.

Or, making this split out of this series, rebase on mm-unstable, and asking
Andrew Morton to carry may be another option.

Andrew and Shuah, may I ask your opinions?


Thanks,
SJ

[...]