[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240212210932.3095265-2-oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 21:09:33 +0000
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
To: kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Print timer ctl register in ISTATUS assertion
Zenghui noted that the test assertion for the ISTATUS bit is printing
the current timer value instead of the control register in the case of
failure. While the assertion is sound, printing CNT isn't informative.
Change things around to actually print the CTL register value instead.
Reported-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/3188e6f1-f150-f7d0-6c2b-5b7608b0b012@huawei.com/
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
---
Applies to kvmarm/next.
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c
index d5e8f365aa01..ab4b604d8ec0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static void guest_validate_irq(unsigned int intid,
__GUEST_ASSERT(xcnt >= cval,
"xcnt = 0x%lx, cval = 0x%lx, xcnt_diff_us = 0x%lx",
xcnt, cval, xcnt_diff_us);
- __GUEST_ASSERT(xctl & CTL_ISTATUS, "xcnt = 0x%lx", xcnt);
+ __GUEST_ASSERT(xctl & CTL_ISTATUS, "xctl = 0x%lx", xctl);
WRITE_ONCE(shared_data->nr_iter, shared_data->nr_iter + 1);
}
base-commit: 680f749c272378a796388a3244bab53b5a952d67
--
2.43.0.687.g38aa6559b0-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists