linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 09/35] KVM: x86: Determine shared/private faults based on vm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:31:26 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, jroedel@...e.de, 
	thomas.lendacky@....com, hpa@...or.com, ardb@...nel.org, seanjc@...gle.com, 
	vkuznets@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org, 
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, slp@...hat.com, pgonda@...gle.com, 
	peterz@...radead.org, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, 
	rientjes@...gle.com, dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com, tobin@....com, bp@...en8.de, 
	vbabka@...e.cz, kirill@...temov.name, ak@...ux.intel.com, tony.luck@...el.com, 
	sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, alpergun@...gle.com, 
	jarkko@...nel.org, ashish.kalra@....com, nikunj.dadhania@....com, 
	pankaj.gupta@....com, liam.merwick@...cle.com, zhi.a.wang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 09/35] KVM: x86: Determine shared/private faults based
 on vm_type

On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 6:24 PM Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com> wrote:
>
> For KVM_X86_SNP_VM, only the PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK flag is needed to
> determine with an #NPF is due to a private/shared access by the guest.
> Implement that handling here. Also add handling needed to deal with
> SNP guests which in some cases will make MMIO accesses with the
> encryption bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          | 12 ++++++++++--
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index d3fbfe0686a0..61213f6648a1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -4331,6 +4331,7 @@ static int kvm_faultin_pfn_private(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  static int __kvm_faultin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
>  {
>         struct kvm_memory_slot *slot = fault->slot;
> +       bool private_fault = fault->is_private;

I think it's nicer to just make the fault !is_private in
kvm_mmu_do_page_fault().

> +static bool kvm_mmu_fault_is_private(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t gpa, u64 err)
> +{
> +       bool private_fault = false;
> +
> +       if (kvm_is_vm_type(kvm, KVM_X86_SNP_VM)) {
> +               private_fault = !!(err & PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK);
> +       } else if (kvm_is_vm_type(kvm, KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM)) {
> +               /*
> +                * This handling is for gmem self-tests and guests that treat
> +                * userspace as the authority on whether a fault should be
> +                * private or not.
> +                */
> +               private_fault = kvm_mem_is_private(kvm, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> +       }

Any reason to remove the is_private page fault that was there in
previous versions of the patch?  I don't really like having both TDX
and SVM-specific code in this function.

Paolo

> +       return private_fault;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Return values of handle_mmio_page_fault(), mmu.page_fault(), fast_page_fault(),
>   * and of course kvm_mmu_do_page_fault().
> @@ -298,7 +316,7 @@ static inline int kvm_mmu_do_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
>                 .max_level = KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL,
>                 .req_level = PG_LEVEL_4K,
>                 .goal_level = PG_LEVEL_4K,
> -               .is_private = kvm_mem_is_private(vcpu->kvm, cr2_or_gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT),
> +               .is_private = kvm_mmu_fault_is_private(vcpu->kvm, cr2_or_gpa, err),
>         };
>         int r;
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>