[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c16c1f18a8c6f33a608618d4ccf7d8c8dbb6f88b.camel@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:30:50 +0000
From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
peter.griffin@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
tudor.ambarus@...aro.org, willmcvicker@...gle.com,
semen.protsenko@...aro.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: add stable i2c aliases for
gs101-oriole
On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 12:18 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> I can drop it, but the actual problem is that what if downstream keeps
> changing aliases? They can do it...
We won't care at that stage, downstream should have no reason to divert from
upstream for numbering at some point in the future.
> The aliases are not there to match
> with downstream, but to have stable interface matching SCHEMATICS.
Except the schematics don't refer to the i2c busses by number.
Cheers,
Andre'
Powered by blists - more mailing lists