[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ad3082c50e21a74de41ca9908bd53b72e1f1a9c.camel@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:52:58 +0000
From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
peter.griffin@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
tudor.ambarus@...aro.org, willmcvicker@...gle.com,
semen.protsenko@...aro.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: add stable i2c aliases for
gs101-oriole
On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 12:40 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/02/2024 12:30, André Draszik wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 12:18 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > I can drop it, but the actual problem is that what if downstream keeps
> > > changing aliases? They can do it...
> >
> > We won't care at that stage, downstream should have no reason to divert from
> > upstream for numbering at some point in the future.
>
> What do you mean by "no reason"? The reason is they can do whatever they
> want. Some project leader says: "I want this" and they will do it. They
> won't care about our upstream choice at all.
>
> And then what, you change it again?
As I said above, we won't care if downstream changes again at that stage, so
no, I wouldn't plan on changing again.
Cheers,
Andre'
Powered by blists - more mailing lists