linux-kernel - [PATCH 07/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement Sensor .is_notify

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240212123233.1230090-8-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 12:32:29 +0000
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@....com,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
	peng.fan@....nxp.com,
	michal.simek@....com,
	quic_sibis@...cinc.com,
	quic_nkela@...cinc.com,
	souvik.chakravarty@....com,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement Sensor .is_notify_supported callback

Add a preliminary check to verify if Sensor-related notify enable commands
are supported at all by the running platform, and then provide the callback
needed to allow the core SCMI notification subsytem to fine-grain check if
a specific resource domain supports notifications.

Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c
index 311149965370..7fc5535ca34c 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c
@@ -215,6 +215,8 @@ struct scmi_sensor_update_notify_payld {
 
 struct sensors_info {
 	u32 version;
+	bool notify_trip_point_cmd;
+	bool notify_continuos_update_cmd;
 	int num_sensors;
 	int max_requests;
 	u64 reg_addr;
@@ -246,6 +248,18 @@ static int scmi_sensor_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
 	}
 
 	ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t);
+
+	if (!ret) {
+		if (!ph->hops->protocol_msg_check(ph,
+						  SENSOR_TRIP_POINT_NOTIFY, NULL))
+			si->notify_trip_point_cmd = true;
+
+		if (!ph->hops->protocol_msg_check(ph,
+						  SENSOR_CONTINUOUS_UPDATE_NOTIFY,
+						  NULL))
+			si->notify_continuos_update_cmd = true;
+	}
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -594,7 +608,8 @@ iter_sens_descr_process_response(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
 	 * Such bitfields are assumed to be zeroed on non
 	 * relevant fw versions...assuming fw not buggy !
 	 */
-	s->update = SUPPORTS_UPDATE_NOTIFY(attrl);
+	if (si->notify_continuos_update_cmd)
+		s->update = SUPPORTS_UPDATE_NOTIFY(attrl);
 	s->timestamped = SUPPORTS_TIMESTAMP(attrl);
 	if (s->timestamped)
 		s->tstamp_scale = S32_EXT(SENSOR_TSTAMP_EXP(attrl));
@@ -988,6 +1003,25 @@ static const struct scmi_sensor_proto_ops sensor_proto_ops = {
 	.config_set = scmi_sensor_config_set,
 };
 
+static bool scmi_sensor_notify_supported(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
+					 u8 evt_id, u32 src_id)
+{
+	bool supported = false;
+	const struct scmi_sensor_info *s;
+	struct sensors_info *sinfo = ph->get_priv(ph);
+
+	s = scmi_sensor_info_get(ph, src_id);
+	if (!s)
+		return false;
+
+	if (evt_id == SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_TRIP_POINT_EVENT)
+		supported = sinfo->notify_trip_point_cmd;
+	else if (evt_id == SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_UPDATE)
+		supported = s->update;
+
+	return supported;
+}
+
 static int scmi_sensor_set_notify_enabled(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
 					  u8 evt_id, u32 src_id, bool enable)
 {
@@ -1099,6 +1133,7 @@ static const struct scmi_event sensor_events[] = {
 };
 
 static const struct scmi_event_ops sensor_event_ops = {
+	.is_notify_supported = scmi_sensor_notify_supported,
 	.get_num_sources = scmi_sensor_get_num_sources,
 	.set_notify_enabled = scmi_sensor_set_notify_enabled,
 	.fill_custom_report = scmi_sensor_fill_custom_report,
-- 
2.43.0