linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 23/25] arm64/mm: Implement pte_batch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <40889617-0820-473e-86ed-04eca6489169@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 14:46:29 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
 Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
 James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, John Hubbard
 <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
 Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>, Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
 Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>,
 "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org,
 linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 23/25] arm64/mm: Implement pte_batch_hint()

On 02.02.24 09:07, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> When core code iterates over a range of ptes and calls ptep_get() for
> each of them, if the range happens to cover contpte mappings, the number
> of pte reads becomes amplified by a factor of the number of PTEs in a
> contpte block. This is because for each call to ptep_get(), the
> implementation must read all of the ptes in the contpte block to which
> it belongs to gather the access and dirty bits.
> 
> This causes a hotspot for fork(), as well as operations that unmap
> memory such as munmap(), exit and madvise(MADV_DONTNEED). Fortunately we
> can fix this by implementing pte_batch_hint() which allows their
> iterators to skip getting the contpte tail ptes when gathering the batch
> of ptes to operate on. This results in the number of PTE reads returning
> to 1 per pte.
> 
> Tested-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 9 +++++++++
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index ad04adb7b87f..353ea67b5d75 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -1220,6 +1220,15 @@ static inline void contpte_try_unfold(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>   		__contpte_try_unfold(mm, addr, ptep, pte);
>   }
>   
> +#define pte_batch_hint pte_batch_hint
> +static inline unsigned int pte_batch_hint(pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
> +{
> +	if (!pte_valid_cont(pte))
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	return CONT_PTES - (((unsigned long)ptep >> 3) & (CONT_PTES - 1));
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * The below functions constitute the public API that arm64 presents to the
>    * core-mm to manipulate PTE entries within their page tables (or at least this

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb