[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d603a588-d312-486e-b6c9-647a6b90580c@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 14:59:02 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ralf Schlatterbeck <rsc@...tux.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Robin van der Gracht
<robin@...tonic.nl>, Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: auxdisplay: hit, hd44780: drop redundant
GPIO node
On 12/02/2024 14:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:38:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 12/02/2024 12:58, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> Anyway, binding examples should not be collection of unrelated
>> solutions, because then we should accept for each device schema several
>> other variations and combinations.
>
> Is this documented?
Yes, writing schema says what the example is. We repeated it multiple
times on multiple reviews, we made multiple commits multiple times and I
briefly mentioned it also in my talks.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists