[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240212143717.GWZcotHRH-8a3x1gTH@fat_crate.local>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:37:17 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@...gle.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/19] x86/head64: Simplify GDT/IDT initialization code
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 07:05:12PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
>
> There used to be two separate code paths for programming the IDT early:
> one that was called via the 1:1 mapping, and one via the kernel virtual
> mapping, where the former used explicit pointer fixups to obtain 1:1
> mapped addresses.
>
> That distinction is now gone so the GDT/IDT init code can be unified and
> simplified accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/head64.c | 57 +++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
Ok, I don't see anything wrong here and since this one is the last of
the cleanup, lemme stop here so that you can send a new revision. We can
deal with whether we want .pi.text later.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists