[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240212143957.gaxxz3nt7pxhlmqh@runtux.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:39:58 +0100
From: Ralf Schlatterbeck <rsc@...tux.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Robin van der Gracht <robin@...tonic.nl>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: auxdisplay: hit, hd44780: drop
redundant GPIO node
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:38:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/02/2024 12:58, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
>
> GPIO expanders and their usage is nothing specific to this device -
> other devices also might benefit of them. Or the SoCs which have enough
> of GPIOs... I really do not understand why do we need expander here and
> how does it help
Can we then at least link the I/O Expander example to the docs of that
display?
I've documented my experience here:
https://blog.runtux.com/posts/2021/01/06/
And at the time there were two out-of-tree implementations.
Note that I think that redundancy in code is bad.
Not so for documentation.
Thanks + kind regards
Ralf
--
Dr. Ralf Schlatterbeck Tel: +43/2243/26465-16
Open Source Consulting www: www.runtux.com
Reichergasse 131, A-3411 Weidling email: office@...tux.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists