linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: ti: Add support for TI J722S Evaluation Module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 17:02:31 +0100
From: "Michael Walle" <mwalle@...nel.org>
To: "Andrew Davis" <afd@...com>, "Vaishnav Achath" <vaishnav.a@...com>,
 <nm@...com>, <vigneshr@...com>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <kristo@...nel.org>,
 <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <u-kumar1@...com>, <j-choudhary@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: ti: Add support for TI J722S
 Evaluation Module

Hi,

On Tue Feb 6, 2024 at 11:06 AM CET, Vaishnav Achath wrote:
> +# Boards with J722s SoC
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-j722s-evm.dtb

I'm a bit confused by your names. What are the new/correct ones now?
Some seem to use the amXX names and some the jXX ones. I've read [1]
and it appears it was suggested to use the am67 names for the device
trees. Esp. because there is already, am62, am64, am65, am68 and
am69 in as names for the device trees.

The TRM you've linked in the cover letter doesn't shed much light
either. It just lists both.

-michael

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/81f90d13-da10-4a68-a0e7-95212f40b3e8@ti.com/            

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (253 bytes)