lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6da6439b-5ced-4c57-b48f-c0fa33f4d524@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 08:41:16 -0800
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
CC: <shuah@...nel.org>, <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] selftests/resctrl: Add non-contiguous CBMs CAT
 test

Hi Maciej,

On 2/11/2024 11:38 PM, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote:
> Sure, I guess I could make the check 'if (bit_center < 3)' to also check if the
> full_cache_mask isn't too short for some reason (since later 2 is substracted
> from bit_center for the 'hole' bit shift).

Thank you.
 
> Or would this need some comment as well (why exactly the '3' is there, maybe
> write something about about the minimal full_cache_mask length for this test)?

The use of "Or" and "as well" makes it unclear what you propose. I do
think the check in addition to a comment will be helpful.

Thank you.

Reinette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ