[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0j3f9xKpE0XBNrv33u68zo5fasEP5yQU_K5qU2oz7RwgA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 15:07:02 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] thermal: thermal-generic-adc: add temperature
sensor function
On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 6:59 PM Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Existing thermal-generic-adc states to be an adc-based thermal
> sensor, which is not entirely true. It provides a thermal sensor
> cell, but it does not provide an IIO sensor cell, which would
> benefit devices that use adc sensors to detect temperature and
> need a custom calibration table.
After reading this changelog and the subject I have to
reverse-engineer the patch to actually find out what's going on.
In particular, are there any user-visible changes of this and if so,
what are they?
> Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/thermal-generic-adc.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal-generic-adc.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal-generic-adc.c
> index 1717e4a19dcb..7e87d928512c 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal-generic-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal-generic-adc.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> * Author: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
> */
> #include <linux/iio/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> @@ -73,6 +74,60 @@ static const struct thermal_zone_device_ops gadc_thermal_ops = {
> .get_temp = gadc_thermal_get_temp,
> };
>
> +static const struct iio_chan_spec gadc_thermal_iio_channel[] = {
> + {
> + .datasheet_name = "temp",
> + .type = IIO_TEMP,
> + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW),
> + .indexed = 1,
> + .channel = 0,
> + }
> +};
> +
> +static int gadc_thermal_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> + int *temp, int *val2, long mask)
> +{
> + struct gadc_thermal_info *gtinfo = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (mask != IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = gadc_thermal_get_temp(gtinfo->tz_dev, temp);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + *temp /= 1000;
> +
> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct iio_info gadc_thermal_iio_info = {
> + .read_raw = gadc_thermal_read_raw,
> +};
> +
> +static int gadc_iio_register(struct device *dev, struct gadc_thermal_info *gti)
> +{
> + struct gadc_thermal_info *gtinfo;
> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> +
> + indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(struct gadc_thermal_info));
> + if (!indio_dev)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + gtinfo = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + memcpy(gtinfo, gti, sizeof(struct gadc_thermal_info));
> +
> + indio_dev->name = dev_name(dev);
> + indio_dev->info = &gadc_thermal_iio_info;
> + indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> + indio_dev->channels = gadc_thermal_iio_channel;
> + indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(gadc_thermal_iio_channel);
> +
> + return devm_iio_device_register(dev, indio_dev);
> +}
> +
> static int gadc_thermal_read_linear_lookup_table(struct device *dev,
> struct gadc_thermal_info *gti)
> {
> @@ -156,7 +211,7 @@ static int gadc_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> devm_thermal_add_hwmon_sysfs(&pdev->dev, gti->tz_dev);
>
> - return 0;
> + return gadc_iio_register(&pdev->dev, gti);
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id of_adc_thermal_match[] = {
> --
> 2.40.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists