[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfbcweVTo0-Xqe0aMyWfX14AHqYB+Y-1iK2nY_gOTHaiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:34:25 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Guru Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@...cinc.com>, Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>, Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...cinc.com,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] arm64: qcom: add and enable SHM Bridge support
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 7:28 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Tested on sm8550 and sa8775p with the Inline Crypto Engine and
> remoteproc.
>
I forgot to mention that I also tested it on db410c where it correctly
reports that:
[ 0.107312] qcom_scm firmware:scm: SHM Bridge not supported
and falls back to using non-SHM bridge allocator.
It was also tested on other platforms by other people which is
reflected in Tested-by tags in this series.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists