linux-kernel - [PATCH v9 01/24] tick/nohz: Move tick_nohz_full

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240213184438.16675-2-james.morse@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 18:44:15 +0000
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
	Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
	D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
	carl@...amperecomputing.com,
	lcherian@...vell.com,
	bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com,
	tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
	baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
	Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
	Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	peternewman@...gle.com,
	dfustini@...libre.com,
	amitsinght@...vell.com,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v9 01/24] tick/nohz: Move tick_nohz_full_mask declaration outside the #ifdef

tick_nohz_full_mask lists the CPUs that are nohz_full. This is only
needed when CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is defined. tick_nohz_full_cpu() allows
a specific CPU to be tested against the mask, and evaluates to false
when CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is not defined.

The resctrl code needs to pick a CPU to run some work on, a new helper
prefers housekeeping CPUs by examining the tick_nohz_full_mask. Hiding
the declaration behind #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL forces all the users to
be behind an ifdef too.

Move the tick_nohz_full_mask declaration, this lets callers drop the
ifdef, and guard access to tick_nohz_full_mask with IS_ENABLED() or
something like tick_nohz_full_cpu().

The definition does not need to be moved as any callers should be
removed at compile time unless CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is defined.

Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>
Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@...amperecomputing.com> # arm64
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Acked-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com> # for resctrl dependency
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/tick.h | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
index 716d17f31c45..0fb903838dfb 100644
--- a/include/linux/tick.h
+++ b/include/linux/tick.h
@@ -164,9 +164,16 @@ static inline u64 get_cpu_idle_time_us(int cpu, u64 *unused) { return -1; }
 static inline u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64 *unused) { return -1; }
 #endif /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
 
+/*
+ * Mask of CPUs that are nohz_full.
+ *
+ * Users should be guarded by CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL or a tick_nohz_full_cpu()
+ * check.
+ */
+extern cpumask_var_t tick_nohz_full_mask;
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
 extern bool tick_nohz_full_running;
-extern cpumask_var_t tick_nohz_full_mask;
 
 static inline bool tick_nohz_full_enabled(void)
 {
-- 
2.39.2