linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: gpio: consistent use of logical line value terminology

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYGTay1s=yK6nWXar-AoVzyZhd=i-h2Ff9xdH7_CO=gdA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 22:40:08 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, brgl@...ev.pl, andy@...nel.org, corbet@....net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: gpio: consistent use of logical line value terminology

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 3:12 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> wrote:

> Consistently use active/inactive to describe logical line values, rather
> than high/low, which is used for physical values, or asserted/de-asserted
> which is awkward.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij