[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202402131436.2CA91AE@keescook>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 14:38:16 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
kent.overstreet@...ux.dev, mhocko@...e.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
hannes@...xchg.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, mgorman@...e.de,
dave@...olabs.net, willy@...radead.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com,
corbet@....net, void@...ifault.com, peterz@...radead.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
arnd@...db.de, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, peterx@...hat.com,
david@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, mcgrof@...nel.org,
masahiroy@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org, dennis@...nel.org,
tj@...nel.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev, rppt@...nel.org,
paulmck@...nel.org, pasha.tatashin@...een.com,
yosryahmed@...gle.com, yuzhao@...gle.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
hughd@...gle.com, andreyknvl@...il.com, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
vvvvvv@...gle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, ebiggers@...gle.com,
ytcoode@...il.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, cl@...ux.com,
penberg@...nel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
glider@...gle.com, elver@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
shakeelb@...gle.com, songmuchun@...edance.com, jbaron@...mai.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/35] lib: add allocation tagging support for memory
allocation profiling
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 02:35:29PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 2:29 PM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 05:01:19PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 2:40 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 01:38:59PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > > > Introduce CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING which provides definitions to easily
> > > > > instrument memory allocators. It registers an "alloc_tags" codetag type
> > > > > with /proc/allocinfo interface to output allocation tag information when
> > > >
> > > > Please don't add anything new to the top-level /proc directory. This
> > > > should likely live in /sys.
> > >
> > > Ack. I'll find a more appropriate place for it then.
> > > It just seemed like such generic information which would belong next
> > > to meminfo/zoneinfo and such...
> >
> > Save yourself a cycle of "rework the whole fs interface only to have
> > someone else tell you no" and put it in debugfs, not sysfs. Wrangling
> > with debugfs is easier than all the macro-happy sysfs stuff; you don't
> > have to integrate with the "device" model; and there is no 'one value
> > per file' rule.
>
> Thanks for the input. This file used to be in debugfs but reviewers
> felt it belonged in /proc if it's to be used in production
> environments. Some distros (like Android) disable debugfs in
> production.
FWIW, I agree debugfs is not right. If others feel it's right in /proc,
I certainly won't NAK -- it's just been that we've traditionally been
trying to avoid continuing to pollute the top-level /proc and instead
associate new things with something in /sys.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists