[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240213223948.1865489-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 23:39:47 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: rafael@...nel.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] powercap: dtpm_cpu: Fix error check against freq_qos_add_request()
The caller of the function freq_qos_add_request() checks again a non
zero value but freq_qos_add_request() can return '1' if the request
already exists. Therefore, the setup function fails while the QoS
request actually did not failed.
Fix that by changing the check against a negative value like all the
other callers of the function.
Fixes: 0e8f68d7f0485 ("Add CPU energy model based support")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
---
drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c b/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
index 9193c3b8edeb..ae7ee611978b 100644
--- a/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static int __dtpm_cpu_setup(int cpu, struct dtpm *parent)
ret = freq_qos_add_request(&policy->constraints,
&dtpm_cpu->qos_req, FREQ_QOS_MAX,
pd->table[pd->nr_perf_states - 1].frequency);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret < 0)
goto out_dtpm_unregister;
cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists