[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <22pec37ketr2pgcqwz4nd5lm55ohv7jvtxw2l7piosbnx3sw7e@gewljn5veatn>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:42:38 +0100
From: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>, Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] dt-bindings: soc: imx: fsl,imx-anatop: add
binding
Hi Krzysztof,
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 01:27:09PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> [...]
> > + tempmon:
> > + type: object
> > + unevaluatedProperties: false
> > + $ref: /schemas/thermal/imx-thermal.yaml
>
> So you just ignored my comment?
> I did not receive any response from you on this.
I had mentioned it in the cover letter next to the changelog:
Unadressed feedback from PATCHv1:
- anatop phandle vs parent: technically it makes sense to just use the
parent, but this driver is only used by i.MX6. The current code makes
use of the phandle, so we cannot drop it because of backwards
compatibility. So I don't see a point in deprecating this property.
(reading it again: s/driver/binding/ and s/code/Linux kernel driver/)
Greetings,
-- Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists