[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240213002746.GB3272429@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 17:27:46 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>
Cc: masahiroy@...nel.org, nicolas@...sle.eu, mark.rutland@....com,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Use -fmin-function-alignment when available
Hi Petr,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 03:53:55PM +0100, Petr Pavlu wrote:
> GCC recently added option -fmin-function-alignment, which should appear
> in GCC 14. Unlike -falign-functions, this option causes all functions to
> be aligned at the specified value, including the cold ones.
>
> Detect availability of -fmin-function-alignment and use it instead of
> -falign-functions when present. Introduce CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
> and make the workarounds for the broken function alignment conditional
> on this setting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>
> ---
> Makefile | 7 ++++++-
> arch/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
> include/linux/compiler_types.h | 10 +++++-----
> kernel/exit.c | 5 ++++-
> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 7e0b2ad98905..9516e43f6e45 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -974,7 +974,12 @@ export CC_FLAGS_CFI
> endif
>
> ifneq ($(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT),0)
> -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -falign-functions=$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT)
> +# Set the minimal function alignment. Try to use the newer GCC option
> +# -fmin-function-alignment, or fall back to -falign-funtions. See also
> +# CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT.
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, \
> + -fmin-function-alignment=$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT), \
> + -falign-functions=$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT))
> endif
>
> # arch Makefile may override CC so keep this after arch Makefile is included
> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> index a5af0edd3eb8..e2448f927fae 100644
> --- a/arch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -1507,4 +1507,12 @@ config FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
> default 4 if FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT_4B
> default 0
>
> +config CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
> + # Detect availability of the GCC option -fmin-function-alignment which
> + # guarantees minimal alignment for all functions. GCC 13 and older have
> + # only -falign-functions which the compiler ignores for cold functions
> + # and this hence requires extra care in the kernel. Clang provides
> + # strict alignment always when using -falign-functions.
> + def_bool $(cc-option, -fmin-function-alignment=8) || CC_IS_CLANG
> +
I think this configuration should be split into something like
CONFIG_CC_HAS_MIN_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT that has the cc-option check then
CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT can depend on that configuration
or Clang as you have it here, so that we can drop the cc-option check in
the main Makefile and have it be:
ifdef CONFIG_CC_HAS_MIN_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fmin-function-alignment=$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT)
else
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -falign-functions=$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT)
endif
It is wasteful to call cc-option twice in my opinion, especially if we
are checking it in Kconfig.
> endmenu
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_types.h b/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> index 663d8791c871..f0152165e83c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> @@ -99,17 +99,17 @@ static inline void __chk_io_ptr(const volatile void __iomem *ptr) { }
> * gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Label-Attributes.html#index-cold-label-attribute
> *
> * When -falign-functions=N is in use, we must avoid the cold attribute as
> - * contemporary versions of GCC drop the alignment for cold functions. Worse,
> - * GCC can implicitly mark callees of cold functions as cold themselves, so
> - * it's not sufficient to add __function_aligned here as that will not ensure
> - * that callees are correctly aligned.
> + * GCC drops the alignment for cold functions. Worse, GCC can implicitly mark
> + * callees of cold functions as cold themselves, so it's not sufficient to add
> + * __function_aligned here as that will not ensure that callees are correctly
> + * aligned.
> *
> * See:
> *
> * https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y77%2FqVgvaJidFpYt@FVFF77S0Q05N
> * https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88345#c9
> */
> -#if !defined(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) || (CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT == 0)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT) || (CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT == 0)
> #define __cold __attribute__((__cold__))
> #else
> #define __cold
> diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
> index dfb963d2f862..5a6fed4ad3df 100644
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -1920,7 +1920,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(thread_group_exited);
> *
> * See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88345#c11
> */
> -__weak __function_aligned void abort(void)
> +#ifndef CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
> +__function_aligned
> +#endif
> +__weak void abort(void)
> {
> BUG();
>
>
> base-commit: 841c35169323cd833294798e58b9bf63fa4fa1de
> --
> 2.35.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists