[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpF677Fu152GQAgD-GW=eFPsRMXfXzyXtnc5p6kPsxeQJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:47:05 -0800
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kent.overstreet@...ux.dev, mhocko@...e.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, hannes@...xchg.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, mgorman@...e.de,
dave@...olabs.net, willy@...radead.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com,
corbet@....net, void@...ifault.com, peterz@...radead.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
arnd@...db.de, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, peterx@...hat.com,
david@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, mcgrof@...nel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org,
nathan@...nel.org, dennis@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev,
rppt@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org, pasha.tatashin@...een.com,
yosryahmed@...gle.com, yuzhao@...gle.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
hughd@...gle.com, andreyknvl@...il.com, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
vvvvvv@...gle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, ebiggers@...gle.com,
ytcoode@...il.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, bristot@...hat.com,
vschneid@...hat.com, cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
42.hyeyoo@...il.com, glider@...gle.com, elver@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
shakeelb@...gle.com, songmuchun@...edance.com, jbaron@...mai.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/35] Memory allocation profiling
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 4:29 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 01:38:46PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > Low overhead [1] per-callsite memory allocation profiling. Not just for debug
> > kernels, overhead low enough to be deployed in production.
>
> What's the plan for things like devm_kmalloc() and similar relatively
> simple wrappers? I was thinking it would be possible to reimplement at
> least devm_kmalloc() with size and flags changing helper a while back:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/202309111428.6F36672F57@keescook/
>
> I suspect it could be possible to adapt the alloc_hooks wrapper in this
> series similarly:
>
> #define alloc_hooks_prep(_do_alloc, _do_prepare, _do_finish, \
> ctx, size, flags) \
> ({ \
> typeof(_do_alloc) _res; \
> DEFINE_ALLOC_TAG(_alloc_tag, _old); \
> ssize_t _size = (size); \
> size_t _usable = _size; \
> gfp_t _flags = (flags); \
> \
> _res = _do_prepare(ctx, &_size, &_flags); \
> if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_res) \
> _res = _do_alloc(_size, _flags); \
> if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_res) \
> _res = _do_finish(ctx, _usable, _size, _flags, _res); \
> _res; \
> })
>
> #define devm_kmalloc(dev, size, flags) \
> alloc_hooks_prep(kmalloc, devm_alloc_prep, devm_alloc_finish, \
> dev, size, flags)
>
> And devm_alloc_prep() and devm_alloc_finish() adapted from the URL
> above.
>
> And _do_finish instances could be marked with __realloc_size(2)
devm_kmalloc() is definitely a great candidate to account separately.
Looks like it's currently using
alloc_dr()->kmalloc_node_track_caller(), so this series will account
the internal kmalloc_node_track_caller() allocation. We can easily
apply alloc_hook to devm_kmalloc() and friends and replace the
kmalloc_node_track_caller() call inside alloc_dr() with
kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof(). That will move accounting directly
to devm_kmalloc().
>
> -Kees
>
> --
> Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists