[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <155d9261-a429-47c4-834b-b435782615ca@sdfg.com.ar>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:04:44 +0100
From: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...g.com.ar>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] tools/nolibc: Fix strlcat() return code and size
usage
On 2/11/24 11:48, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> For me it's 58 bytes, or 19 less / 25% smaller, and at first glance it
> should do the right thing as well.
Oh, here I get almost the same (57 bytes), so it must be the example we
are compiling what is different.
I'll check this after some sleep :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists