linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: qca,ar9331: convert to DT schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ab453a46-84da-4ac7-82e0-41e2349abcf4@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 08:32:28 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
 Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Oleksij Rempel
 <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: qca,ar9331: convert to DT schema

On 12/02/2024 20:25, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 07:29:11PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca,ar9331.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca,ar9331.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..fd9ddc59d38c
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca,ar9331.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> 
> I don't recall whether or not Pengutronix are on the carte blache list
> for relicensing bindings under the dual license.
> 
> Otherwise,
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>

Only two sentences from description were copied, which do not carry
substantial information, so we could argue that there is not much to
copyright.

Best regards,
Krzysztof