[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <875feb7e-7e2e-4f91-9b9b-ce4f74854648@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 08:41:10 +0000
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>, hch@....de,
djwong@...nel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org,
dchinner@...hat.com, jack@...e.cz, chandan.babu@...cle.com
Cc: martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
tytso@....edu, jbongio@...gle.com, ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] block atomic writes for XFS
On 13/02/2024 07:45, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com> writes:
>
>> This series expands atomic write support to filesystems, specifically
>> XFS. Since XFS rtvol supports extent alignment already, support will
>> initially be added there. When XFS forcealign feature is merged, then we
>> can similarly support atomic writes for a non-rtvol filesystem.
>>
>> Flag FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES is added as an enabling flag for atomic writes.
>>
>> For XFS rtvol, support can be enabled through xfs_io command:
>> $xfs_io -c "chattr +W" filename
>> $xfs_io -c "lsattr -v" filename
>> [realtime, atomic-writes] filename
>
> Hi John,
>
> I first took your block atomic write patch series [1] and then applied this
> series on top. I also compiled xfsprogs with chattr atomic write support from [2].
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20240124113841.31824-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com/T/#m4ad28b480a8e12eb51467e17208d98ca50041ff2
> [2]: https://github.com/johnpgarry/xfsprogs-dev/commits/atomicwrites/
>
>
> But while setting +W attr, I see an Invalid argument error. Is there
> anything I need to do first?
>
> root@...ntu:~# /root/xt/xfsprogs-dev/io/xfs_io -c "chattr +W" /mnt1/test/f1
> xfs_io: cannot set flags on /mnt1/test/f1: Invalid argument
>
> root@...ntu:~# /root/xt/xfsprogs-dev/io/xfs_io -c "lsattr -v" /mnt1/test/f1
> [realtime] /mnt1/test/f1
Can you provide your full steps?
I'm doing something like:
# /mkfs.xfs -r rtdev=/dev/sdb,extsize=16k -d rtinherit=1 /dev/sda
meta-data=/dev/sda isize=512 agcount=4, agsize=22400 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1
= crc=1 finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=0
= reflink=0 bigtime=1 inobtcount=1
nrext64=0
data = bsize=4096 blocks=89600, imaxpct=25
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0, ftype=1
log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=16384, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =/dev/sdb extsz=16384 blocks=89600, rtextents=22400
# mount /dev/sda mnt -o rtdev=/dev/sdb
[ 5.553482] XFS (sda): EXPERIMENTAL atomic writes feature in use. Use
at your own risk!
[ 5.556752] XFS (sda): Mounting V5 Filesystem
6e0820e6-4d44-4c3e-89f2-21b4d4480f88
[ 5.602315] XFS (sda): Ending clean mount
#
# touch mnt/file
# /xfs_io -c "lsattr -v" mnt/file
[realtime] mnt/file
#
#
# /xfs_io -c "chattr +W" mnt/file
# /xfs_io -c "lsattr -v" mnt/file
[realtime, atomic-writes] mnt/file
And then we can check limits:
# /test-statx -a /root/mnt/file
dump_statx results=9fff
Size: 0 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 16384 regular file
Device: 08:00 Inode: 131 Links: 1
Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: 0 Gid: 0
Access: 2024-02-13 08:31:51.962900974+0000
Modify: 2024-02-13 08:31:51.962900974+0000
Change: 2024-02-13 08:31:51.969900974+0000
Birth: 2024-02-13 08:31:51.962900974+0000
stx_attributes_mask=0x603070
STATX_ATTR_WRITE_ATOMIC set
unit min: 4096
unit max: 16384
segments max: 1
Attributes: 0000000000400000 (........ ........ ........ ........
....... .?-..... ..--.... .---....)
#
#
Does xfs_io have a statx function? If so, I can add support for atomic
writes for statx there. In the meantime, that test-statx code is also on
my branch, and can be run on the block device file (to sanity check that
the rtvol device supports atomic writes).
Thanks,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists