| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <170782072242.398.18224261385789305537.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 10:38:42 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun@...wei.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, stable@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: irq/urgent] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Fix GICv4.1 VPE affinity update
The following commit has been merged into the irq/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: af9acbfc2c4b72c378d0b9a2ee023ed01055d3e2
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/af9acbfc2c4b72c378d0b9a2ee023ed01055d3e2
Author: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 10:12:06
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitterDate: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:29:52 +01:00
irqchip/gic-v3-its: Fix GICv4.1 VPE affinity update
When updating the affinity of a VPE, the VMOVP command is currently skipped
if the two CPUs are part of the same VPE affinity.
But this is wrong, as the doorbell corresponding to this VPE is still
delivered on the 'old' CPU, which screws up the balancing. Furthermore,
offlining that 'old' CPU results in doorbell interrupts generated for this
VPE being discarded.
The harsh reality is that VMOVP cannot be elided when a set_affinity()
request occurs. It needs to be obeyed, and if an optimisation is to be
made, it is at the point where the affinity change request is made (such as
in KVM).
Drop the VMOVP elision altogether, and only use the vpe_table_mask
to try and stay within the same ITS affinity group if at all possible.
Fixes: dd3f050a216e (irqchip/gic-v4.1: Implement the v4.1 flavour of VMOVP)
Reported-by: Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213101206.2137483-4-maz@kernel.org
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index 250b456..53abd47 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -3826,8 +3826,9 @@ static int its_vpe_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
bool force)
{
struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
- int from, cpu = cpumask_first(mask_val);
+ struct cpumask common, *table_mask;
unsigned long flags;
+ int from, cpu;
/*
* Changing affinity is mega expensive, so let's be as lazy as
@@ -3843,19 +3844,22 @@ static int its_vpe_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
* taken on any vLPI handling path that evaluates vpe->col_idx.
*/
from = vpe_to_cpuid_lock(vpe, &flags);
- if (from == cpu)
- goto out;
-
- vpe->col_idx = cpu;
+ table_mask = gic_data_rdist_cpu(from)->vpe_table_mask;
/*
- * GICv4.1 allows us to skip VMOVP if moving to a cpu whose RD
- * is sharing its VPE table with the current one.
+ * If we are offered another CPU in the same GICv4.1 ITS
+ * affinity, pick this one. Otherwise, any CPU will do.
*/
- if (gic_data_rdist_cpu(cpu)->vpe_table_mask &&
- cpumask_test_cpu(from, gic_data_rdist_cpu(cpu)->vpe_table_mask))
+ if (table_mask && cpumask_and(&common, mask_val, table_mask))
+ cpu = cpumask_test_cpu(from, &common) ? from : cpumask_first(&common);
+ else
+ cpu = cpumask_first(mask_val);
+
+ if (from == cpu)
goto out;
+ vpe->col_idx = cpu;
+
its_send_vmovp(vpe);
its_vpe_db_proxy_move(vpe, from, cpu);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists