linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/12] memory: stm32-fmc2-ebi: update the driver to support revision 2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 13:36:16 +0100
From: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] memory: stm32-fmc2-ebi: update the driver to
 support revision 2



On 2/13/24 08:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The function is not really readable anymore. Please split it into three
> functions: for v1 (so original code), v2 and wrapper choosing it based
> on revision). Or two functions and some sort of ops with function
> pointers (so you call ops->check_clk_period). Or just parametrize the
> registers with two different "struct reg_field" and use appropriate one
> for given revision (the code looks the same!)
> Or just two set of stm32_fmc2_child_props...
> 
> Anyway the duplicated code just two read different register is it not
> the way to go.

Hi Krzysztof,

As I said in patch 4, I am going to rewrite this patch and I am going to
use the platform data to distinguish between each variant instead of
checking the IP revision.

Regards,
Christophe Kerello.