[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7aa1ac00-0db4-934a-94d5-b5daacaeb863@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 14:52:16 +0200 (EET)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>
cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: think-lmi: Fix password opcode ordering
for workstations
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024, Mark Pearson wrote:
> Thanks Ilpo
>
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2024, at 10:34 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Feb 2024, Mark Pearson wrote:
> >
> >> The Lenovo workstations require the password opcode to be run before
> >> the attribute value is changed (if Admin password is enabled).
> >>
> >> Tested on some Thinkpads to confirm they are OK with this order too.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>
> >
> > Would a Fixes tag be appropriate here?
>
> Hmmm - good point, though it has been "wrong" since it was originally implemented (where we tested on Thinkpads).
>
> I guess I could use the commit ID from when I originally implemented opcodes?
> Fixes: 640a5fa ("platform/x86: think-lmi: Opcode support")
Yes, in that case the original commit is the correct one.
> Do you want me to push a new version with this?
I think this is simple enough to go through fixes branch so it depends on
Hans.
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists