linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH ver.2] gtp: fix use-after-free and null-ptr-deref in gtp_genl_dump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 20:30:25 +0300
From: kovalev@...linux.org
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 edumazet@...gle.com, laforge@...monks.org, davem@...emloft.net,
 kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, nickel@...linux.org,
 oficerovas@...linux.org, dutyrok@...linux.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ver.2] gtp: fix use-after-free and null-ptr-deref in
 gtp_genl_dump_pdp()

14.02.2024 20:13, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Ok, then a series of fixes probably needs to happen so each maintain
> can review and apply them.
>
> Maybe some of these subsystems above can only be compiled built-in, so
> that cannot trigger.
>
> In any case, are you up to pick on that series?
>
> Thanks.
Yes, I can prepare several patches with the same commit message. Is it 
better to send them individually (like this patch) or in a series with a 
brief preliminary description (PATCH 0/x)?

-- 
Regards,
Vasiliy Kovalev