lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 18:41:54 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
	Russ Weight <russ.weight@...ux.dev>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Dent Project <dentproject@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 14/17] dt-bindings: net: pse-pd: Add bindings
 for PD692x0 PSE controller

> Alternative A and B Overview
> ----------------------------
> 
> - **Alternative A:** Utilizes the data-carrying pairs for power transmission in
>   10/100BaseT networks. The power delivery's polarity in this alternative can
>   vary based on the MDI (Medium Dependent Interface) or MDI-X (Medium Dependent
>   Interface Crossover) configuration.
> 
> - **Alternative B:** Delivers power over the spare pairs not used for data in
>   10/100BaseT networks. Unlike Alternative A, Alternative B's method separates
>   power from data lines within the cable. Though it is less influenced by data
>   transmission direction, Alternative B includes two configurations with
>   different polarities, known as variant X and variant S, to accommodate
>   different network requirements and device specifications.

Thanks for this documentation.

It might be worth pointing out that RJ-45 supports up to 4
pairs. However, 10/100BaseT only makes use of two pairs for data
transfer from the four. 1000BaseT and above make use of all four pairs
for data transfer. If you don't know this, it is not so obvious what
'data-carrying pairs' and 'spare pairs' mean.

And what happens for 1000BaseT when all four pairs are in use?

    Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ