lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zcz9WNXpRzv8THKW@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 19:50:16 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] auxdisplay: Move cfag12864b.h to the subsystem
 folder

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 06:42:56PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 6:40 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > I don't want to rebase, esp. taking into account the proposal below.
> 
> Why do you not want to rebase?

It's a standard practice in the Linux kernel development.
If it's not a so critical issue, why should we rebase?

rebasing will break SHA sums and it's not appreciated especially at the late
rcX weeks. Linus can even refuse to accept a PR based on this fact.

> The proposal is orthogonal in any case.

True.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ