linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix vendor strings on Rockchip boards

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 19:30:44 +0100
From: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Tim Lunn <tim@...thertop.org>, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, Andy
 Yan <andyshrk@....com>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
 <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Chris Morgan
 <macromorgan@...mail.com>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Cristian
 Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>, David Heidelberg
 <david@...t.cz>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Jagan Teki
 <jagan@...eble.ai>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Tianling Shen
 <cnsztl@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix vendor strings on Rockchip boards

Hello Conor,

On 2024-02-14 19:12, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:27:08PM +1100, Tim Lunn wrote:
>> On 2/14/24 15:14, Dragan Simic wrote:
>> > On 2024-02-14 05:07, Tim Lunn wrote:
>> > > A couple of rockchip boards incorrectly list their vendor as Rockchip
>> > > when they are in fact not manufactured by Rockchip.
>> > >
>> > > Fix the vendor strings to correctly list the manufacturer
>> >
>> > Just checking, have you verified that the old, incorrect "compatible"
>> > strings from the board dts files aren't used anywhere in the kernel code,
>> > such as in some drivers?
>> >
>> Yes I checked that, there are no remaining references to the 
>> old/incorrect
>> compatible strings in kernel code
> 
> What about other code? Like a BSD or a bootloader? If nothing is using
> them
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>

I just quickly checked U-Boot and it's fine.

> Fixes tags I think wouldn't go amiss, but I'm not expecting a resend
> with them.