linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] rust: str: add {make,to}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zc0UNUGbmmBlzBAv@boqun-archlinux>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 11:27:49 -0800
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>
Cc: ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com, wedsonaf@...il.com,
	gary@...yguo.net, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, benno.lossin@...ton.me,
	a.hindborg@...sung.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com,
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rust: str: add {make,to}_{upper,lower}case() to
 CString

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 06:24:10PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> Add functions to convert a CString to upper- / lowercase, either
> in-place or by creating a copy of the original CString.
> 
> Naming followes the one from the Rust stdlib, where functions starting
> with 'to' create a copy and functions starting with 'make' perform an
> in-place conversion.
> 
> This is required by the Nova project (GSP only Rust successor of
> Nouveau) to convert stringified enum values (representing different GPU
> chipsets) to strings in order to generate the corresponding firmware
> paths. See also [1].
> 
> [1] https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/288089-General/topic/String.20manipulation.20in.20kernel.20Rust
> 
> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>
> ---
> Changes in V3:
>   - add an `impl DerefMut for CString`, such that these functions can be defined
>     for `CStr` as `&mut self` and still be called on a `CString`
> Changes in V2:
>   - expand commit message mentioning the use case
>   - expand function doc comments to match the ones from Rust's stdlib
>   - rename to_* to make_* and add the actual to_* implementations
> ---
>  rust/kernel/str.rs | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/str.rs b/rust/kernel/str.rs
> index 7d848b83add4..02d6e510b852 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/str.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/str.rs
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
>  use alloc::alloc::AllocError;
>  use alloc::vec::Vec;
>  use core::fmt::{self, Write};
> -use core::ops::{self, Deref, Index};
> +use core::ops::{self, Deref, DerefMut, Index};
>  
>  use crate::{
>      bindings,
> @@ -143,6 +143,19 @@ pub const fn from_bytes_with_nul(bytes: &[u8]) -> Result<&Self, CStrConvertError
>          unsafe { core::mem::transmute(bytes) }
>      }
>  
> +    /// Creates a mutable [`CStr`] from a `[u8]` without performing any
> +    /// additional checks.
> +    ///
> +    /// # Safety
> +    ///
> +    /// `bytes` *must* end with a `NUL` byte, and should only have a single
> +    /// `NUL` byte (or the string will be truncated).
> +    #[inline]
> +    pub const unsafe fn from_bytes_with_nul_unchecked_mut(bytes: &mut [u8]) -> &mut CStr {
> +        // SAFETY: Properties of `bytes` guaranteed by the safety precondition.
> +        unsafe { &mut *(bytes as *mut [u8] as *mut CStr) }

First `.cast::<[u8]>().cast::<CStr>()` is preferred than `as`. Besides,
I think the dereference (or reborrow) is only safe if `CStr` is
`#[repr(transparent)]. I.e.

	#[repr(transparent)]
	pub struct CStr([u8]);

with that you can implement the function as (you can still use `cast()`
implementation, but I sometimes find `transmute` is more simple).

    pub const unsafe fn from_bytes_with_nul_unchecked_mut(bytes: &mut [u8]) -> &mut CStr {
	// SAFETY: `CStr` is transparent to `[u8]`, so the transmute is
	// safe to do, and per the function safety requirement, `bytes`
	// is a valid `CStr`.
	unsafe { core::mem::transmute(bytes) }
    }

but this is just my thought, better wait for others' feedback as well.

Regards,
Boqun