[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zc05FiqYKgtNHUL7@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:05:10 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Remove the XFS mrlock
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:24:21PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> XFS has an mrlock wrapper around the rwsem which adds only the
> functionality of knowing whether the rwsem is currently held in read
> or write mode. Both regular rwsems and rt-rwsems know this, they just
> don't expose it as an API. By adding that, we can remove the XFS mrlock
> as well as improving the debug assertions for the mmap_lock when lockdep
> is disabled.
>
> I have an ack on the first patch from Peter, so I would like to see this
> merged through the XFS tree since most of what it touches is XFS.
What needs to happen to get these picked up to not miss the next merge
window?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists