[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240214173318.2be1f3c9@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 17:33:18 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
<rafael@...nel.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Smita
Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, "Mathieu Desnoyers"
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi/ghes: Prevent sleeping with spinlock held
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:19:19 -0800
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com> wrote:
> > > Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > So I'm thinking this is a won't fix - wait for the printk rework to land and
> > > > assume this will be resolved as well?
> > >
> > > That pretty much sums up what I was about to say ;-)
> > >
> > > tp_printk is more of a hack and not to be used sparingly. With the right
> > > trace events it can hang the machine.
> > >
> > > So, you can use your internal patch locally, but I would recommend waiting
> > > for the new printk changes to land.
>
> Steven, Do you think that will land in 6.9?
>
> > >
> > > I'm really hoping that will be soon!
> > >
I may be like Jon Corbet predicting RT will land in mainline if I do.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists