linux-kernel - [PATCH 29/31] selftests: ntsync: Add a stress test for contended waits.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240214235307.10494-20-zfigura@codeweavers.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 17:53:04 -0600
From: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@...eweavers.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	wine-devel@...ehq.org,
	André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
	Arkadiusz Hiler <ahiler@...eweavers.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@...eweavers.com>
Subject: [PATCH 29/31] selftests: ntsync: Add a stress test for contended waits.

Test a more realistic usage pattern, and one with heavy contention, in order to
actually exercise ntsync's internal synchronization.

This test has several threads in a tight loop acquiring a mutex, modifying some
shared data, and then releasing the mutex. At the end we check if the data is
consistent.

Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@...eweavers.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
index 40cfdd356ef4..aba513c9af01 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
@@ -1330,4 +1330,78 @@ TEST(alert_all)
 	close(fd);
 }
 
+#define STRESS_LOOPS 10000
+#define STRESS_THREADS 4
+
+static unsigned int stress_counter;
+static int stress_device, stress_start_event, stress_mutex;
+
+static void *stress_thread(void *arg)
+{
+	struct ntsync_wait_args wait_args = {0};
+	__u32 index, count, i;
+	int ret;
+
+	wait_args.timeout = UINT64_MAX;
+	wait_args.count = 1;
+	wait_args.objs = (uintptr_t)&stress_start_event;
+	wait_args.owner = gettid();
+	wait_args.index = 0xdeadbeef;
+
+	ioctl(stress_device, NTSYNC_IOC_WAIT_ANY, &wait_args);
+
+	wait_args.objs = (uintptr_t)&stress_mutex;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < STRESS_LOOPS; ++i) {
+		ioctl(stress_device, NTSYNC_IOC_WAIT_ANY, &wait_args);
+
+		++stress_counter;
+
+		unlock_mutex(stress_mutex, wait_args.owner, &count);
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+TEST(stress_wait)
+{
+	struct ntsync_event_args event_args;
+	struct ntsync_mutex_args mutex_args;
+	pthread_t threads[STRESS_THREADS];
+	__u32 signaled, i;
+	int ret;
+
+	stress_device = open("/dev/ntsync", O_CLOEXEC | O_RDONLY);
+	ASSERT_LE(0, stress_device);
+
+	mutex_args.owner = 0;
+	mutex_args.count = 0;
+	ret = ioctl(stress_device, NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_MUTEX, &mutex_args);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+	stress_mutex = mutex_args.mutex;
+
+	event_args.manual = 1;
+	event_args.signaled = 0;
+	ret = ioctl(stress_device, NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_EVENT, &event_args);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+	stress_start_event = event_args.event;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < STRESS_THREADS; ++i)
+		pthread_create(&threads[i], NULL, stress_thread, NULL);
+
+	ret = ioctl(stress_start_event, NTSYNC_IOC_EVENT_SET, &signaled);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < STRESS_THREADS; ++i) {
+		ret = pthread_join(threads[i], NULL);
+		EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+	}
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(STRESS_LOOPS * STRESS_THREADS, stress_counter);
+
+	close(stress_start_event);
+	close(stress_mutex);
+	close(stress_device);
+}
+
 TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
-- 
2.43.0