linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] pwm: lpss: drop redundant runtime PM handles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:04:09 +0200
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
 mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] pwm: lpss: drop redundant runtime PM handles

On 2/12/24 08:10, Raag Jadav wrote:
> We no longer need empty runtime PM handles for PCI devices after commit
> c5eb1190074c ("PCI / PM: Allow runtime PM without callback functions").
> Drop them and let PCI core take care of power state transitions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss-pci.c | 22 ----------------------
>   1 file changed, 22 deletions(-)
> 
Will this patch cause a regression if applied without your another patch 
to the drivers/pci/pci-driver.c?

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20240212063233.5599-1-raag.jadav@intel.com/