linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] block atomic writes for XFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f7d8dd6d-3c7a-404c-9ccc-1f9904447667@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 10:10:16 +0000
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>, hch@....de,
        djwong@...nel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org,
        dchinner@...hat.com, jack@...e.cz, chandan.babu@...cle.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        tytso@....edu, jbongio@...gle.com, ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] block atomic writes for XFS

On 13/02/2024 22:49, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> Does xfs_io have a statx function?
> Yes, it's right there in the man page:
> 
> 	statx [ -v|-r ][ -m basic | -m all | -m <mask> ][ -FD ]
>                Selected statistics from stat(2) and the XFS_IOC_GETXATTR system call on the current file.
>                   -v  Show timestamps.
>                   -r  Dump raw statx structure values.
>                   -m basic
>                       Set the field mask for the statx call to STATX_BASIC_STATS.
>                   -m all
>                       Set the the field mask for the statx call to STATX_ALL (default).
>                   -m <mask>
>                       Specify a numeric field mask for the statx call.
>                   -F  Force the attributes to be synced with the server.
>                   -D  Don't sync attributes with the server.

ok, I can check that out and look to add any support required for atomic 
writes extension.

Thanks,
John