lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c49e4415-7cd5-e1ba-e6c6-5086730b9866@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 11:52:24 +0200 (EET)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vishnu Sankar <vishnuocv@...il.com>
cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, 
    LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
    Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>, vsankar@...ovo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Simplify thermal mode
 checking

On Wed, 14 Feb 2024, Vishnu Sankar wrote:

Thanks for doing this, it's major improvement to readability already as 
is, and even more of after the second patch!!

> Add a thermal_read_mode_check helper function to make the code

thermal_read_mode_check()

remove "function" as it's obvious.

> simpler during init.
> This helps particularly when the new TPEC_12 mode is added in
> the next patch.

Flow the paragraph normally without the premature line break.
 
> Suggested-by: Ilpo Jarvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...el.com>

This is not my email address, please use

Suggested-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>

> Signed-off-by: Vishnu Sankar <vishnuocv@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 136 +++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> index c4895e9bc714..2428c8bd0fa2 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> @@ -6147,6 +6147,71 @@ struct ibm_thermal_sensors_struct {
>  static enum thermal_access_mode thermal_read_mode;
>  static bool thermal_use_labels;
>  
> +/* Function to check thermal read mode */
> +static enum thermal_access_mode thermal_read_mode_check(void)
> +{
> +	u8 t, ta1, ta2, ver = 0;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (thinkpad_id.ec_model) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Direct EC access mode: sensors at registers
> +		 * 0x78-0x7F, 0xC0-0xC7.  Registers return 0x00 for

Remove the double space, one is enough in kernel comments.

> +		 * non-implemented, thermal sensors return 0x80 when
> +		 * not available

Add the missing . please.

Perhaps add a empty line here to make this two paragraphs.

> +		 * The above rule is unfortunately flawed. This has been seen with
> +		 * 0xC2 (power supply ID) causing thermal control problems.
> +		 * The EC version can be determined by offset 0xEF and at least for
> +		 * version 3 the Lenovo firmware team confirmed that registers 0xC0-0xC7
> +		 * are not thermal registers.
> +		 */

While the patch touches this, this entire comment should be reflowed 
properly for 80 columns.

> +		if (!acpi_ec_read(TP_EC_FUNCREV, &ver))
> +			pr_warn("Thinkpad ACPI EC unable to access EC version\n");
> +
> +		ta1 = ta2 = 0;
> +		for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
> +			if (acpi_ec_read(TP_EC_THERMAL_TMP0 + i, &t)) {
> +				ta1 |= t;
> +			} else {
> +				ta1 = 0;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +			if (ver < 3) {
> +				if (acpi_ec_read(TP_EC_THERMAL_TMP8 + i, &t)) {
> +					ta2 |= t;
> +				} else {
> +					ta1 = 0;
> +					break;
> +				}
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +		if (ta1 == 0) {
> +			pr_err("ThinkPad ACPI EC access misbehaving, disabling thermal sensors access\n");
> +			return TPACPI_THERMAL_NONE;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (ver >= 3) {
> +			thermal_use_labels = true;
> +			return TPACPI_THERMAL_TPEC_8;
> +		}
> +
> +		return (ta2 != 0) ? TPACPI_THERMAL_TPEC_16 : TPACPI_THERMAL_TPEC_8;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (acpi_evalf(ec_handle, NULL, "TMP7", "qv")) {
> +		if (tpacpi_is_ibm() &&
> +		    acpi_evalf(ec_handle, NULL, "UPDT", "qv"))

Single line and keep the braces please (I know it will go >80 chars but no 
important info is lost).

> +			/* 600e/x, 770e, 770x */
> +			return TPACPI_THERMAL_ACPI_UPDT;
> +		/* IBM/LENOVO DSDT EC.TMPx access, max 8 sensors */
> +		return TPACPI_THERMAL_ACPI_TMP07;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* temperatures not supported on 570, G4x, R30, R31, R32 */
> +	return TPACPI_THERMAL_NONE;
> +}
> +
>  /* idx is zero-based */
>  static int thermal_get_sensor(int idx, s32 *value)
>  {
> @@ -6375,78 +6440,9 @@ static const struct attribute_group temp_label_attr_group = {
>  
>  static int __init thermal_init(struct ibm_init_struct *iibm)
>  {
> -	u8 t, ta1, ta2, ver = 0;
> -	int i;
> -	int acpi_tmp7;
> -
>  	vdbg_printk(TPACPI_DBG_INIT, "initializing thermal subdriver\n");
>  
> -	acpi_tmp7 = acpi_evalf(ec_handle, NULL, "TMP7", "qv");
> -
> -	if (thinkpad_id.ec_model) {
> -		/*
> -		 * Direct EC access mode: sensors at registers
> -		 * 0x78-0x7F, 0xC0-0xC7.  Registers return 0x00 for
> -		 * non-implemented, thermal sensors return 0x80 when
> -		 * not available
> -		 * The above rule is unfortunately flawed. This has been seen with
> -		 * 0xC2 (power supply ID) causing thermal control problems.
> -		 * The EC version can be determined by offset 0xEF and at least for
> -		 * version 3 the Lenovo firmware team confirmed that registers 0xC0-0xC7
> -		 * are not thermal registers.
> -		 */
> -		if (!acpi_ec_read(TP_EC_FUNCREV, &ver))
> -			pr_warn("Thinkpad ACPI EC unable to access EC version\n");
> -
> -		ta1 = ta2 = 0;
> -		for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
> -			if (acpi_ec_read(TP_EC_THERMAL_TMP0 + i, &t)) {
> -				ta1 |= t;
> -			} else {
> -				ta1 = 0;
> -				break;
> -			}
> -			if (ver < 3) {
> -				if (acpi_ec_read(TP_EC_THERMAL_TMP8 + i, &t)) {
> -					ta2 |= t;
> -				} else {
> -					ta1 = 0;
> -					break;
> -				}
> -			}
> -		}
> -		if (ta1 == 0) {
> -			/* This is sheer paranoia, but we handle it anyway */
> -			if (acpi_tmp7) {
> -				pr_err("ThinkPad ACPI EC access misbehaving, falling back to ACPI TMPx access mode\n");
> -				thermal_read_mode = TPACPI_THERMAL_ACPI_TMP07;

Eh, where did this go in the new helper?

-- 
 i.

> -			} else {
> -				pr_err("ThinkPad ACPI EC access misbehaving, disabling thermal sensors access\n");
> -				thermal_read_mode = TPACPI_THERMAL_NONE;
> -			}
> -		} else {
> -			if (ver >= 3) {
> -				thermal_read_mode = TPACPI_THERMAL_TPEC_8;
> -				thermal_use_labels = true;
> -			} else {
> -				thermal_read_mode =
> -					(ta2 != 0) ?
> -					TPACPI_THERMAL_TPEC_16 : TPACPI_THERMAL_TPEC_8;
> -			}
> -		}
> -	} else if (acpi_tmp7) {
> -		if (tpacpi_is_ibm() &&
> -		    acpi_evalf(ec_handle, NULL, "UPDT", "qv")) {
> -			/* 600e/x, 770e, 770x */
> -			thermal_read_mode = TPACPI_THERMAL_ACPI_UPDT;
> -		} else {
> -			/* IBM/LENOVO DSDT EC.TMPx access, max 8 sensors */
> -			thermal_read_mode = TPACPI_THERMAL_ACPI_TMP07;
> -		}
> -	} else {
> -		/* temperatures not supported on 570, G4x, R30, R31, R32 */
> -		thermal_read_mode = TPACPI_THERMAL_NONE;
> -	}
> +	thermal_read_mode = thermal_read_mode_check();
>  
>  	vdbg_printk(TPACPI_DBG_INIT, "thermal is %s, mode %d\n",
>  		str_supported(thermal_read_mode != TPACPI_THERMAL_NONE),
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ