linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] PM: QoS: Add a performance QoS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 11:41:57 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: caleb.connolly@...aro.org, lina.iyer@...aro.org, lukasz.luba@....com,
 quic_manafm@...cinc.com, quic_priyjain@...cinc.com,
 linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] PM: QoS: Add a performance QoS

Hi Rafael,

On 12/02/2024 18:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 6:58 PM Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>>

[ ... ]

> 
> I sent a comment on the first patch in the series and please note that
> 0-day has reported build issues with this one.  I guess it needs to be
> refreshed.
> 
> At the general level, I think that it would be good to add at least
> one user of this framework along with it, as a matter of illustration
> how it is going to (or at least how it is intended to) be used.  For
> example, what is going to happen when user space updates one of the
> limits via sysfs for a given device?

I think Caleb is doing a port of the QMI TMD series he posted to the 
performance QoS.

-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog