[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zcy3fwAZXwJZpqqu@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:52:15 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: sysfs: fix inverted pointer logic
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 09:52:48AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
..
> Fixes: d83cee3d2bb1 ("gpio: protect the pointer to gpio_chip in gpio_device with SRCU")
I'm wondering if instead tons of fixes you can just fold the patches and rebase your tree.
Yes, we still have time to let it soak in Linux Next, so Torvalds won't complain.
It will be much less burden to anybody who wants to backport this nice work.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists