[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zcy5qZ4rEbpY7ouC@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:01:29 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com, mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
stanislaw.gruszka@...ux.intel.com, lukas@...ner.de,
rafael@...nel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
sashal@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PCI / PM: Really allow runtime PM without callback
functions
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 12:43:35PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 02:06:48PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 12:02:33PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
..
> > > 0) | pm_runtime_work() {
> > > 0) | rpm_idle() {
> > > 0) | rpm_check_suspend_allowed() {
> > > 0) 1.500 us | __dev_pm_qos_resume_latency(); /* = 0x7fffffff */
> > > 0) 4.840 us | } /* rpm_check_suspend_allowed = 0x0 */
> > > 0) 1.550 us | __rpm_get_callback(); /* = 0xffffffffb4bc84f0 */
> > > 0) 1.800 us | pci_pm_runtime_idle(); /* = -38 */
> > > 0) + 17.070 us | } /* rpm_idle = -38 */
> > > 0) + 22.450 us | } /* pm_runtime_work = -38 */
> >
> > What is this timing information telling me?
>
> It's a raw ftrace dump.
(Told ya that people would be surprised with this without seeing how you get
this and what fields mean)
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists