linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] PCI / PM: Really allow runtime PM without callback functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:01:29 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com, mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
	stanislaw.gruszka@...ux.intel.com, lukas@...ner.de,
	rafael@...nel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	sashal@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PCI / PM: Really allow runtime PM without callback
 functions

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 12:43:35PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 02:06:48PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 12:02:33PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:

..

> > >  0)               |  pm_runtime_work() {
> > >  0)               |    rpm_idle() {
> > >  0)               |      rpm_check_suspend_allowed() {
> > >  0)   1.500 us    |        __dev_pm_qos_resume_latency(); /* = 0x7fffffff */
> > >  0)   4.840 us    |      } /* rpm_check_suspend_allowed = 0x0 */
> > >  0)   1.550 us    |      __rpm_get_callback(); /* = 0xffffffffb4bc84f0 */
> > >  0)   1.800 us    |      pci_pm_runtime_idle(); /* = -38 */
> > >  0) + 17.070 us   |    } /* rpm_idle = -38 */
> > >  0) + 22.450 us   |  } /* pm_runtime_work = -38 */
> > 
> > What is this timing information telling me?
> 
> It's a raw ftrace dump.

(Told ya that people would be surprised with this without seeing how you get
 this and what fields mean)

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko