[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6370b20f-96fb-4918-bef0-7555563c9ce2@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 16:13:55 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mhocko@...e.com, hannes@...xchg.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
mgorman@...e.de, dave@...olabs.net, willy@...radead.org,
liam.howlett@...cle.com, corbet@....net, void@...ifault.com,
peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, peterx@...hat.com,
david@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, mcgrof@...nel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org,
nathan@...nel.org, dennis@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev,
rppt@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org, pasha.tatashin@...een.com,
yosryahmed@...gle.com, yuzhao@...gle.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
hughd@...gle.com, andreyknvl@...il.com, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
vvvvvv@...gle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, ebiggers@...gle.com,
ytcoode@...il.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, bristot@...hat.com,
vschneid@...hat.com, cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com, glider@...gle.com,
elver@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com, shakeelb@...gle.com,
songmuchun@...edance.com, jbaron@...mai.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
minchan@...gle.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 23/35] mm/slub: Mark slab_free_freelist_hook()
__always_inline
On 2/13/24 03:08, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 04:31:14PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 01:39:09PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
>> > From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
>> >
>> > It seems we need to be more forceful with the compiler on this one.
>>
>> Sure, but why?
>
> Wasn't getting inlined without it, and that's one we do want inlined -
> it's only called in one place.
It would be better to mention this in the changelog so it's clear this is
for performance and not e.g. needed for the code tagging to work as expected.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists