linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Add some bounds checking to firmware data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:44:19 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>, 
 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, 
 Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>, 
 Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>, 
 Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>, 
 Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>, 
 Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>, 
 Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, 
 sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Add some bounds checking to firmware data

On Fri, 09 Feb 2024 16:02:16 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Smatch complains about "head->full_size - head->header_size" can
> underflow.  To some extent, we're always going to have to trust the
> firmware a bit.  However, it's easy enough to add a check for negatives,
> and let's add a upper bounds check as well.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: SOF: Add some bounds checking to firmware data
      commit: 98f681b0f84cfc3a1d83287b77697679e0398306

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark